[ASK AN EXPERT] What's The Average Portfolio Size For A Full-Time Grant Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fed18/fed183f0315e02a6f8aa159c62d62878bc200421" alt="Ask an Expert"
Full Platform Overview Chat With Us
Full Platform Overview Chat With Us
Our Ask An Expert series features real questions answered by Claire Axelrad, J.D., CFRE, our very own Fundraising Coach, also known as Charity Clairity. Today’s question comes from a nonprofit employee who wants advice on what the average foundation portfolio size is for a full-time grant manager:
Dear Charity Clairity,
What is the average foundation portfolio size for a full-time grant manager? I can’t find an answer anywhere! I know this will vary depending on the GM’s salary and their fundraising goal, but there has to be a formula somewhere. I have been told by a higher up that our GM should be doing more. In FY23 they submitted 40 proposals for a total of $2.4M in asks. We received funding of just over $1M from their efforts.
— Need Direction
Dear Need Direction,
While it’s generally a good idea to look for metrics against which to measure performance, in this case it’s a difficult thing to quantify. Which is probably why you’ve been unable to find a formula. And, as far as I’m aware, none exists. If I found one, I’d be suspicious of it. Let me tell you why.
Your grants manager could be sending out carbon copy proposals every day of the week, but that’s unlikely to improve your ROI. In fact, arguably, it could diminish your returns. Because it would mean you were not taking the time to make good matches, put together the most persuasive proposals possible, and do effective reporting to cement your relationship – and reputation for excellent execution and follow-through – with the funder.
And this takes time.
These other parts of the grant process take more time.
If your grant manager is responsible for putting these items together, they need the time to do so. Plus, they need access to the information necessary to provide accuracy and transparency. When it comes to supporting information, some documents will be standard; once they’re pulled together, they only need to be updated annually. Other information, like the project budget, must be created for every single proposal. For reports, often the grant manager will need to ask the program manager to submit information to them that addresses all key outcomes outlined in the grant application and award. They’ll then need to edit, massage, and rewrite to put your best foot forward. Will your grants manager do this? Your finance manager? A program manager? Ideally, it should be a collaborative effort.
It also depends, to an extent, on foundation priorities in any given year. These are both things no grant manager, no matter how skilled, can control.
Some organizations will have more of the things foundations are looking for than others. Some will have a stronger track record, more seasoned leadership, more experienced staff, greater longevity, cover a different geographic area, focus on a different market niche… and so forth.
I only know what you’ve presented here, but at first blush it looks like a completely acceptable ROI. You’re bringing in a good sum of money (certainly more than you spend on the grant manager position). Plus, on average, you’re able to submit a proposal just short of weekly (with time off for vacation, holidays and sick time). And part of the grant manager’s job is also to submit reports for all grants awarded!
Have I seen grant managers do more? Yes. But rarely. And they’ve generally been with the organization long enough to know it very well and in their position long enough to have all the information they need at their fingertips.
Have I seen grant managers do less? Frequently.
Count your blessings.
— Charity Clairity (Please use a pseudonym if you prefer to be anonymous when you submit your own question, like “Need Direction” did.)
P.S. I did find one Foundation Center 2004 survey reporting the majority of foundations funded 25-49% of proposals. Additionally, organizations that gave out less funding overall (e.g., smaller community foundations) funded a higher percentage of proposals than larger organizations. I could not find similar data for more recent years.
Comments